Society and Culture in the 21st Century
Main language of instruction: Spanish
Other languages of instruction: English
If the student is enrolled for the English track then classes for that subject will be taught in the same language.
Head instructor
Dra. Gloria ROMANELLO - gromanello@uic.es
Dra. Maria Lucia PÉREZ - lperezp@uic.es
Office hours
By groupal or personal appointment at: alfonsp@uic.es
Also welcome with no appointment trying at
PROF. ALFONS PUIGARNAU (front door signal next door Classroom Alpha 301)
Cheers!
By cultural management we understand the administration of the resources of a cultural organization with the aim of offering a product or service that reaches the largest number of public or consumers, providing maximum satisfaction.
The cultural manager, therefore, manages "culture" making it accessible to the contemporary human being.
The general objective of the subject is to offer a theoretical reflection of the "mission" of the manager. It answers the question "for what", contextualizing it in today's society.
The specific and transversal objectives proposed for the achievement of the general objective are:
As future cultural managers we will look for answers in Museums and Cultural Institutions of Barcelona, as well as in some of the most relevant contemporary authors and their different theoretical perspectives. In addition, one important object of our study will be the multicultural contribution of the components of the international group.
1. To owe and understand
To understand reality
To know the relationship between the whole and its parts
Knowledge is not to have but rather to be
Study habit
To improve your work plan skills
To schedule yourself
To verify, to revise, to correct
2. To apply knowledge
Problems solution-oriented
To be right and not only to spend time in doing things
To multiply your working capacity
Competitiveness
Real problem solving
Sense of opportunity and efficiency
Self-esteem and confidence in work
3. To assemble, to interpret
To judge
To consider
To seek the virtue
To share vital decisions
Sense of prudence
Patience
4. To communicate
Explanatory clarity
To go to the core of thins without neglecting the secondary
To generate confidence around
To transmit innovation together with the value of tradition
Quality in the briefness
5. To be autonomous
To be able to consult without wasting your time
To be able to depend on others
To be a wise person without being self-sufficient
To avoid precipitation
To exercise control on reality
COMPETENCES
1. The kernel of the targets of the new organization of the education (Bologna European University Space) is the competitions acquisition on the part of the students.
2. It will have to do emphasis on the learning methods of the above mentioned competitions and on the procedures to avaluate them.
3. The term competency is used here exclusively in its academic meaning, and not in the meaning of professional attribution. It is a combination of knowledge, skills (intellectual, manual, social, etc.), attitudes and values to solve problems or to intervene in matters.
BASIC COMPETENCES
CB1 To have and understand knowledge which provides a grounding or opportunity to be original in terms of the development and/or application of ideas, often in a research-based context.
CB3 To be able to integrate knowledge and face the complexity of making judgments from information that, although incomplete or limited, includes reflections on social and ethical responsibilities linked to the application of their knowledge and judgments.
GENERAL COMPETENCES
CG5 To act responsibly, and produce good quality rigorous and efficient work that is placed at the service of society.
CG6 To demonstrate an ability to be open and flexible in attending to cultural and social diversity in the environment.
CG7 To know how to apply and adapt to new technologies in processes of cultural management, production and dissemination.
CROSS-DISCIPLINARY COMPETENCES
CT1 To design, direct, produce and evaluate projects, programs, strategies, policies or cultural actions which involve a wide variety of different professional profiles, agents and institutions.
SPECIFIC COMPETENCES
1. Historiographical Literacy. Students will build on their training to deepen their knowledge of the cultural and social significance of masterworks or masterpieces. They will deepen their understanding of the ideas and social contexts in which proposed culture works are placed.
2. Critical Thinking. Students will be able to investigate critically how specific scholars in their field of specialization have discussed the ideas and masterworks in conflict with other aspects of historical and social development within particular cultures. By the end of their course, students should be able both to critique cultural and social scholarship in their area of specialization and to begin to deploy significant methodological strategies in their own work as will be manifested in their MA thesis
3. Research Skills. Students will strengthen their ability to develop appropriate research topics and questions to effectively shape their projects. They will be able to find appropriate research sources through the effective use of material in libraries and databases, and will develop the ability to use archival or other primary sources.
4. Communication Skills. Students will strengthen their ability to organize and express their thoughts clearly and coherently both in writing and orally. They will learn to produce cogent arguments for their research papers, developing a clear analysis of topics and source materials, and of the scholarly structure of their field of specialization. They will also have learned to use articulate, grammatically correct language and to construct thorough investigations research papers, skills that will culminate in the MA thesis project.
Academic activities & teaching methodology |
Description |
Lectures |
Theoretical classes in which the lecturer/professor provides the specific conceptual and methodological grounding of the subject |
Undertaking practical excercises |
Undertaking various types of exercises |
Writing up and presenting individual work |
Individual work which requires research, content analysis, the application of critical thinking, writing and/or the presentation of conclusions verbally |
Autonomous work by the student |
An in-depth look at the knowledge received and its consolidation through autonomous learning activities |
Analysis and discussion of texts, specialized articles, films and Cultural Institutions |
Analysis, comment and discussion of specific content whether in text, audiovisual formats or visits to Cultural Institutions |
Tutorials |
Meetings between a lecturer/professor and one or various students in order to oversee the learning evolution and guide the work within the framework of the subjects which form part of the curriculum |
Basic concepts of the theoretical framework of the subject will be presented, through traditional master classes and text readings. However, the main methodology for this subject will be the participative expository methodology. Dialogue, open debate and shared active reflection that will allow students not only to accumulate knowledge, but also to develop critical awareness.
A second methodological tool will be the study of practical cases. We will study some Cultural Institutions in Barcelona and the students will organize a brief scientific investigation around one of the subjects of the program that will consist in a case study of a Cultural Institution, Museum or Exhibition taking place at the moment in Barcelona. For its preparation we will have a workshop provided by the Library on “research techniques”.
To achieve the expected learning outcomes for the oral presentation of the written works, we will apply the TOASTMASTERS method. By giving speeches, gaining feedback, leading teams and guiding others to achieve their goals in a supportive atmosphere. This will promote the exchange of knowledge and experiences, collective work and the practical application of the learned.
EVALUATION SYSTEMS AND CRITERIA
Class attendance and participation 25% |
A Critical assessment of intervention in class based on the contributions and attitude of the student |
Written work 25% |
The writing of a brief scientific investigation paper on one of the topics of the program that will consist of a case study of a Cultural Institution, Museum or currently Exhibition in Barcelona. Its extension must be 5 pages. This work requires research, content analysis, the application of critical thinking and conclusions. It will assess the maturity in the approach and the originality of the reflection, as well as its adequacy to the work of analysis and reflection on the themes developed in the course. Two papers about the visits of Cultural Institutions Deadline: 20th November |
Oral presentation 25% |
The oral presentation will evaluate the ability to organize and express clearly and coherently. The student is expected to demonstrate complete knowledge of the subject, to present information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow and with no grammatical errors. As well as non-verbal skills such as eye contact or body language. From the 22nd to the 27nd November |
Evaluation exercise 25% |
At the end of Miguel López Remiro class time |
BIBLIOGRAPHY AND RESOURCES
Basic
Becker. H. S. (1982) Art worlds. University of California Press.
Bourdieu, P (2000). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Routledge Classics.
Florida, R. (2005). Cities and the creative class. New York/Oxon. Routeledge.
Gombrich, E.H. (1995). The Story of Art. Phaidon Press. London
Rocher, G. (1970). A General Introduction to Sociology. A Theoretical Perspective. Canada: Mcmillan
Recommended readings
Alexander, V.D. (1996). From philanthropy to funding: The effects of corporate and public support on American art museums. Poetics, 24(2-4), 87-129
Aron, R. (2009). Main currents in sociological thought. Transaction Publishers. New Jersey
Barthes, R. (1967). “The Death of the Author”. Aspen, 5-7
Bauman, Z. (1999). Culture as Praxis. Sage. London
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Polity Press. Cambridge
Bell, D. (1996). The Cultural Contradiction of Capitalism. Basic Books
Bourdieu, P. & Darbel, A. (1997). The Love of Art: European Art Museums and their public. Polity Press
Chan, T. W., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (2007). Data, methods and interpretation in analyses of cultural consumption: A reply to Peterson and Wuggenig. Poetics, 35(4–5), 317–329.
Cicchelli, Vi., Octobre, S., & Riegel, V. (2016). After the Omnivore, the Cosmopolitan amatuer: reflections about Aesthetic Cosmopolitanism. The Global Studies Journal.
Crane, D. (2009). Reflections on the global art market: implications for the Sociology of Culture. Sociedade E Estado, Brasilia 2(2), 331–362.
Currid, E. (2007). How Art and Culture happen in New York. Implications for Urban Economic Development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 73(4), 454–468.
Duncan, C. (1995) The art museum as ritual, en Civilizing Rituals, London/NY, Routledge pp. 7-20.
Fishman, R.M., Lizardo, O. (2013) How Macro-Historical Change Shapes Cultural Taste, American Sociological Review. 78(2), pp. 213–239.
Gaarder, J. (1994). Sophie’s world. Norway: Berkley books
Girard, A., (1982) Cultural industries: a handicap or a new opportunity for cultural development?, en UNESCO, Cultural industries. A challenge for the future of culture. Paris, France, pp. 24-39.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic books
Held, D. et al. “Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture”, Politics at the Edge. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2000. p. 14-28
Johnson, P. (2001). Modern Times. Perennial Classics. London
McLean, F. (2007) Museums and the costruction of national identity, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 3(4), pp. 244-252.
Peterson, R.A. (1990) Why 1955? The Advent of Rock Music, Popular Music, 9, pp. 97-116.
Peterson, R.A. (1992) Understanding audience segmentation: From elite and mass to omnivore and univore, Poetics: Journal of Empirical Research on Literature, Media, and the Arts, vol. 21, pp. 243-258.
Peterson, R.A., Kern, R.M. (1996) Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore. American Sociological Review, 61(5), pp. 900-907.
Peterson, R.A., Anand, N. (2004) The Production of Culture Perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), pp. 311–334.
Ritzer, G. (2013). Sociological Theory. McGraw-Hill Education. New York
Ritzer, G. (2012). Contemporary Sociological Theory and Its Classical Roots. McGraw-Hill Education. New York
Ulrich, B. (1992). Risk Society. Sage Publications UK