In person

The evaluation process corresponds to a continuous evaluation by competencies throughout the completion of the TFG. There are several evaluative moments, as well as the agents or actors of the evaluation:

• Evaluation of the process of carrying out the TFG by the tutor.
• Final evaluation of the TFG by the tutor.
• Evaluation of the TFG by the court.

For the evaluation of the TFG, the following criteria will be taken into account:

• Entity, difficulty, complexity and originality of the project included in the TFG.
• Degree of achievement of the objectives.
• Bibliographic sources consulted and how they have been cited in the memory and in the presentation.
• Quality in the elaboration of the written document of the academic memory of the TFG.
• Quality in the presentation and oral defense before the court of the TFG.
• Degree of commitment and dedication of the students to the research project.
• Learning, skills and abilities demonstrated during the performance of the work.

The tutor may decide not to authorize the presentation of a TFG by a student (leaving a record of this in the corresponding rubric) if he considers that he does not meet the minimum academic requirements to be publicly defended. The tutor will propose, in the last rubric of evaluation of the written memory of the TFG, the granting of honors to that student or not. Depending on the number of honors that can be awarded per subject and the global evaluations obtained by that student in all the rubrics of the subject compiled from the court, the tutor, the student himself and his classmates, the TFG coordinator will ultimately decide Instance to whom the honors degree is awarded. The evaluation court will be made up of professors from the department of basic sciences, in the case of the research project, or by expert collaborators in the field of study. The court, once the oral defense is finished, will proceed to accept or reject the work presented and to fill in the rubrics evaluating both the written work and the oral defense of the student. In the event that the TFG is rejected by the court, it must record those errors, omissions and deficiencies that must be corrected and that motivate its non-acceptance in a written report that will be sent to the TFG coordinator and the tutor. In case of suspending the TFG in the first call, it will be possible to opt for its defense in the second call as long as the TFG is reworked taking into account the errors, omissions and deficiencies detected and noted by the court in its report after the defense in the first call and with the approval of the tutor. In case of suspending the TFG in the second call, the student must enroll in the subject during the following course. Percentages of each evaluation in the final grade of the subject, valid for both 1st and 2nd call: 5 % Continuous assessment tutor 25% Tutor final evaluation 35% Evaluation court defense and memory 35%

Rubric	Note percentage
Tutor Continuous assessment	10 %
Tutor Final assessment	30 %
Evaluation court defense and memory	60 %

Important considerations: 

1. The TFG subject is approved with a minimum of 5 out of 10 points. 
2. To obtain the final average, a minimum of 5 out of 10 points must be obtained from each of the parts. 
3. Plagiarism, copying or any other action that can be considered cheating will result in a zero in that evaluation section. 
4. Exchange students (Erasmus and others) or repeaters will be subject to the same conditions as the rest of the student body.