Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

Digital Design in Dentistry

Digital Design in Dentistry
3
16535
1
Annual
OB
Main language of instruction: Catalan

Other languages of instruction: English, Spanish

Teaching staff


Dra. FENOY ILLACER, María del Pilar - pilarfenoy@uic.es

Introduction

The Digital Dentistry Design course offers comprehensive theoretical and practical training divided into two semester-long blocks: an initial, primarily practical phase focused on the use of software and scanning tools, and a second, theoretical phase centered on the systematic review and critical analysis of current scientific literature in digital dentistry.

Pre-course requirements

 

 Basic knowledge of dental anatomy, occlusion, and dental prosthetics.   Fundamental computer skills at the user level.   Ability to read and comprehend scientific articles in technical English.      

Objectives

• First Semester: Train the student in taking digital impressions (intraoral scanning) and in the computer-aided design (CAD) of restorations using various design software programs.
• Second Semester: Provide the student with the methodological tools for searching, critically reading, and reviewing the latest scientific literature on digital technology in dentistry.
• Understand the scientific evidence supporting the use of various digital workflows compared to conventional methods.

Competences/Learning outcomes of the degree programme

  • CB10 - Students should acquire the learning skills that allow them to continue to study.
  • CE11 - Students should be autonomous in terms of developing and applying new technologies to aesthetic restorative dentistry and searching for new scientific information, as well as acquiring the ability to evaluate and undertake the research and development projects the industry offers in an ethical way, and manage the financial and human resources, as well as be aware of the strategic basis for the transfer of new knowledge to the industry.
  • CE5 - To be able to give public presentations on your own clinical cases based on the scientific literature, and correctly use the scientific terminology related to temporomandibular dysfunction and aesthetic restorative dentistry.
  • CE7 - To be able to search for, organise and analyse, from a critical point of view, and using biomedical sources of information, scientific literature on issues related to temporomandibular dysfunction and aesthetic restorative dentistry, in order to pursue continuing education in a self-directed and autonomous way.

Learning outcomes of the subject

  • - Scientific Evidence in Aesthetic Restorative Dentistry - - The student knows the bases and criteria of aesthetic diagnosis and smile analysis - The student understands the principles of osseointegration and prosthetics on implants - The student knows the mechanisms and materials of adhesion in dentistry on different materials - The student knows in depth dental and oral anatomy - The student analyzes the scientific literature with a critical spirit. - The student analyzes the quality of the scientific literature by its content rather than by its presentation and format. - The student searches for scientific information on topics related to the function of aesthetic restorative dentistry. - The student carries out a bibliographic review on specific topics in the field of aesthetic restorative dentistry and takes into account its relationships with other areas of dentistry, in order to be able to act in an advanced and multidisciplinary way. - The student learns to apply the research methodology in his scientific works. - The student learns the bases of statistical analysis necessary for the development of his research works and the analysis of the results obtained. - Students assume that the review of scientific literature must be an essential tool in their professional work and that all clinical procedures used in the profession must be based on scientific evidence. - Students publish bibliographic reviews by having the theoretical and practical bases to carry them out. - Students integrate knowledge and face the complexity of formulating judgments based on clinical and bibliographic information that can sometimes be limited.
  • - New Technologies in Aesthetic Restorative Dentistry - Students are constantly updated in the field of new technologies and professional materials in order to become restorative dentists in continuous training. - Students learn to prepare teeth in order to perform complex treatments in direct and indirect surgery. - Students learn to perform the most complex treatments in direct and indirect dental surgery. - Students maintain contacts with industry and commercial firms in order to communicate their needs as an expert professional in the advanced and multidisciplinary field of aesthetic restorative dentistry. They also work with them to initiate new research or technologies.
  • - Multidisciplinary or complex clinical planning - The student is able to correctly use the scientific terminology related to aesthetic restorative dentistry, carrying out a correct extraoral analysis and diagnosis of the lower third of the patient's face, highlighting the aesthetic and functional aspects of the teeth and soft tissues of the mouth in this analysis. He/she also knows how to carry out a correct intraoral exploration and diagnosis of the masticatory apparatus of patients. - Students are able to identify and reproduce the criteria of dental macroaesthetics and microaesthetics, also in the hard and soft tissues of the mouth. - The student is able to analyse and diagnose highly complex clinical cases as well as carry out multidisciplinary planning. - The student is able to present and discuss their treatment plans based on scientific literature in the field of Aesthetic Restorative Dentistry. - The student has a basic multidisciplinary training that allows him/her to plan treatments that encompass Orthodontics, Surgery, Periodontology, Prosthodontics and Occlusion. - Students are able to make public presentations on clinical cases, with all the diagnostic details and complementary examinations required, making proposals for treatment plans referenced in the scientific literature. - Students have a clear and advanced knowledge of concepts such as osseointegration, passive adaptation, torque, implant connection, implant surface, type of prosthetic abutment, types of impressions to be made, transfer of functional and aesthetic occlusal parameters... They also choose, in a personalized way for each patient, the different implant abutments and carry out the different tests and checks of the prosthetic components during the process of making oral prostheses, managing to control this process at all times so that the finished stomatological prostheses meet the functional and aesthetic objectives set at the beginning. - Students have scientific knowledge to choose the type of material with which the rehabilitation to be installed in the patient is made. - Students have the tools to keep their continuing education up to date. They must know how to adapt their clinical practice and technological equipment to the advances and modifications that occur throughout their professional life, which can be autonomous and self-directed.
  • - Laboratory Techniques for Oral Rehabilitation - - Formulates appropriate research questions. - The student understands the fundamental concepts of removable prostheses. - The student prepares a treatment plan for removable prostheses. - The student makes partial and total removable prostheses with different materials. - The student understands the fundamentals of temporomandibular disorders. - The student interprets diagnostic tests for temporomandibular joint disorders. - The student knows and understands the updated treatments for temporomandibular disorders. - The student makes appliances for the treatment of temporomandibular joint disorders. - The student understands and executes the principles of dental tissue preparation for direct and indirect operative treatments. - The student understands and executes the principles of dental tissue preparation for adhesive and non-adhesive fixed prosthesis treatments. - The student understands the fundamentals of adhesive and non-adhesive fixed prostheses. - The student makes provisional and definitive fixed prostheses.

Bibliography and resources

  • Bibliografía básica y artículos de revisión:

Tema 1. Introducción a la odontología digital

• Rekow ED. Digital dentistry: The new state of the art – Is it disruptive or destructive? Dent Mater. 2020;36(1):9-24.

• Alghazzawi TF. Advancements in CAD/CAM technology: Options for practical implementation. J Prosthodont Res. 2016;60(2):72-84.

• Fasbinder DJ. Digital dentistry: Innovation for restorative treatment. Compend Conin Educ Dent. 2010;4:2-11.

• Gant GT, Campbell SD, Masri RM, Andersen MR, American College of Prosthodontists Digital Dentistry Glossary Development Task Force. Glossary of Digital Dental Terms: American College of Prosthodontists. J Prosthodont. 2016; 25 Suppl 2: S2-9.

Tema 2. Escáneres intraorales

• Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G, Logozzo S. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0442-x.

• Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, Viguie G, Viennot S, Robinson P, Farges JC, Fages M, Duarte M. Intraoral Scanner Technologies: A Review to Make Successful Impression. J Healthc Eng. 2017;2017:8427595. doi: 10.1155/2017/8427595. Pub 2017 Sep 5.

• Jansen CE. Understanding the Potential of Digital Intraoral and Benchtop Scanning Workflows. Compend Conin Educ Dent. 2015;36(10):726-31.

• Al-Hassiny H, Al-Hassiny H, Al-Hassiny A. Institute of digital dentistry. Review of the intramural scanners at IDS 2019.

Tema 3. Protocolos de escaneado y reproducibilidad. Parte I

• Müller P, Ender A, Joda T, Katsoulis J. Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner. Quintessence Int. 2016;47(4):343-9.

• Revilla-León M, Jiang P, Sadeghpour M, Piedra-Cascón W, Zandinejad A, Özcan M, Krishnamurthy VR. Intraoral digital scans: Part 1-Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intramural scanners. J Prosthet Dent. 2019; Dec 18. pii: S0022-3913(18)30992-2. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.003. [Epub ahead of print].

• Revilla-León M, Jiang P, Sadeghpour M, Piedra-Cascón W, Zandinejad A, Özcan M, Krishnamurthy VR. Intraoral digital scans: Part 1-Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the mesh quality of different intraoral scanners. J Prosthet Dent. 2019; Dec 20. pii: S0022-3913(18)30995-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.004. [Epub ahead of print].

Tema 4. Protocolos de escaneado y reproducibilidad. Parte II

• Renne W, Ludlow M, Fryml J, Church Z, Mennito A, Kessler R, Lauer A. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons. J Prosthodont Dent. 2017;118(1):36-42.

• Su TS, Sun J. Comparison of repeatability between intraoral digital scanner and extraoral digital scanner: An in-vitro study. J Prosthodont Res. 2015;59(4):236-42.

• Park JM. Comparative analysis on reproducibility among 5 intraoral scanners: sectional analysis according to restoration type and preparation outline form. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016;8(5):354-62.

• Kim RJ. Park JM, Shim JS. Accuracy of 9 intraoral scanners for complete-arch image acquisition: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120(6):895-903e1. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.035.

Tema 5. Impresiones digitales vs. convencionales. Parte I

• Ting-Shu S, Jian S. Intraoral Digital Impression Technique: A Review. J Prosthodont. 2015;24(4):313-21.

• Ahlholm P, Sipilä K, Vallittu P, Jakonen M, Kotiranta U. Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review. J Prosthodont. 2018;27(1):35-41.

• Chochlidakis KM, Papaspyridakos P, Geminiani A, Chen CJ, Feng IJ, Ercoli C. Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(2):184-190e12. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2105.12.017.

Tema 6. Impresiones digitales vs. convencionales. Parte II

• Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H. Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14:10. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-10.

• Schepke U, Meijer HJ, Kerdijk W, Cane MS. Digital versus analog complete-arch impressions for single-unit premolar implant crowns: Operating time and patient preference. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(3):403-6e1. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.003.

• Joda T, Lenherr P, Dedem P, Kovaltschuk I, Bragger U, Zitzmann NU. Time efficiency, difficulty, and operator’s preference comparing digital and conventional implant impressions: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(10):1318-23. doi: 10.1111/clr.12982.

• Al Hamad KQ. Learning curve of intraoral scanning by prosthodontics residents. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;132(2):277-83. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.04.003.

• Zitzmann NU, Kovaltschuk I, Lenherr P, Dedem P, Joda T. Dental Student’s Perceptions of Digital and Conventional Impression Techniques: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Dent Educ. 2017;81(10):1227-32. doi: 10.21815/JDE.017.081.

Tema 7. Arcos faciales virtuales

• Petre A, Drafta S, Stefanescu C, Oancea L. Virtual facebow technique using standardized background images. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(5):724-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.07.008.

• Solaberrieta E, Mínguez R, Barrenetxea L, Otegi JR, Szentpétery A. Comparison of the accuracy of a 3-dimensional virtual method and the conventional method for transferring the maxillary cast to a virtual articulator. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;113(3):191-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.029.

• Venezia P, Torsello F. Orientation of digital casts according to facial lines. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120(6):964-5. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.016.

• Piedra-Gascón W, Meyer MJ, Methani MM, Revilla-León M. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of dual-structured light facial scanner and i n t e r x a m i n e r r e l i a b i l i t y. J P r o s t h e t D e n t. 2 0 2 0. p i i : S0022-3913(19)30689-4. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.10.010.

Tema 8. Articuladores virtuales

• Hsu MR, Driscoll CF, Romberg E, Masri R. Accuracy of Dynamic Virtual Articulation: Trueness and Precision. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(4):436-43. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13035.

• Try E, Fornai C, Weber GW. Accuracy of transferring analog dental cast to virtual articulator. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(2):305-13. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.019.

• See JM, Oh WS, Lee JJ. A technique for verifying the accuracy of the virtual mounting of digital scans against the actual occlusal contacts. J P ro s t h e t D e n t. 2 0 1 9 ; 1 2 1 ( 5 ) : 7 2 9 - 3 2. d o i : 1 0. 1 0 1 6 / j.prosdent.2018.08.003.

Tema 9. Oclusión virtual

• Edher F, Hannam AG, Tobias DL, Wyatt CCL. The accuracy of virtual interocclusal registration during intraoral scanning. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120(6):904-12. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.024.

• Fraile C, Ferreiroa A, Solaberrieta E, Pradíes G. Intraoral versus extraoral digital occlusal records: a pilot study. Int J Comput Dent. 2018;21(4):329-33.

• Ayuso-Montero R, Mariano-Hernandez Y, Khoury-Ribas L, Rovira-Lastra B, Willaert E, Martinez-Gomis J. Reliability and Validity of T-Scan and 3D Intraoral Scanning for Measuring the Occlusal Contact Area. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(1):19-25. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13096.

• Solaberrieta E, Garmendia A, Brizuela A, Otegi JR, Pradíes G, Szentpétery A. Intraoral Digital Impressions for Virtual Occlusal Records: Selection Quantity and Dimensions. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:7173824. doi: 10.1155/2016/7173824.

Tema 10. Digitalización del paciente

• Joda T, Wolfart S, Reich S, Zitzmann NU. Virtual Dental Patient: How Long Until It’s Here?. Current Oral Health Reports. 2018. doi: 10.1007/s40496-018-0178-y.

• Vandenberghe B. The digital patient - Imaging science in dentistry. J Dent. 2018;74(1):S21-S26. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.04.019.

• Coachman C, Calamita MA, Sesma N. Dynamic Documentation of the Smile and the 2D/3D Digital Smile Design Proces. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017;37(2):183-193. doi: 10.11607/prd.2911.

• Rutkünas V, Dirsè J, Bilius V. Accuracy of an intraoral digital scanner in tooth color determination. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(2):322-29. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.020.

• Gross D, Gross K, Wilhelmy S. Digitalization in dentistry: ethical and implications. Quintessence Int. 2019;50(10):830-38. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a43151.

• Coachman C, Calamita MA. Digital Smile Design: A Tool for Treatment Planning and Communication in Esthetic Dentistry. QDT. 2012.

• McLaren EA, Garber DA, Figueira J. The Photoshop Smile Design technique (part 1): digital dental photography. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013;34(10):772-76.

Tema 11. Digitalización del paciente edéntulo

• Lo Russo L, Caradonna G, Troiano G, Salamini A, Guida L, Ciavarella D. Three-dimensional differences between intraoral scans and conventional impressions of edentulous jaws: A clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(2):264-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.04.004.

• Att W, Chen YW, Papaspyridakos P. Registration of patient-relevant references in edentulous jaws using intraoral scanners: simplification of the clinical procedure. Int J Esthet Dent. 2019;14(4):394-404.

• Lo Russo L, Caradonna G, Salamini A, Guida L. Intraoral scans of edentulous arches for denture design in a single procedure. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(2):215-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.03.022.

• Hassan B, Gimenez Gonzalez B, Tahmaseb A, Greven M, Wismeijer D. A digital approach integrating facial scanning in a CAD-CAM workflow for complete-mouth implant-supported rehabilitation of patients with edentulism: A pilot clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(4):486-92. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.033.

• Chebib N, Kalberer N, Srinivasan M, Maniewicz S, Perneger T, Müller F. Edentulous jaw impression techniques: An in vivo comparison of trueness. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(4):623-30. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.08.016.

• Goodacre BJ, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ. Using intraoral scanning to capture complete denture impressions, tooth positions, and centric relation records. Int J Prosthodont. 2018;31(4):377-81. doi: 10.1016/ijp.5741.

Tema 12. Digitalización del paciente: protocolos de tratamiento

• Dolcini GA, Colombo M, Mangano C. From Guided Surgery to Final Prosthesis with a Fully Digital Procedure: A Prospective Clinical Study on 15 Partially Edentulous Patients. Int J Dent. 2016;2016:7358423:. doi: 10.1155/2016/7358423.

• Stanley M, Paz AG, Miguel I, Coachman C. Fully digital workflow, integrating dental scan, smile design and CAD-CAM: case report. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1):143:. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0597-0.

• Shao J, Qing H, Zhu Z, Li L. CAD-CAM-fabricated interim fixed complete-arch implant-supported restorations based on the existing dentition. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(5):717-23. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.09.024.

• Espona J, Roig E, Ali A, Roig M. Immediate loaded interim complete- arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses fabricated with a completely digital workflow: A clinical technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2019; Dec 17: pii: S0022-3913(19)30530-X. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.08.008.

• Lepidi L, Chen Z, Ravida A, Lan T, Wang HL, Li J. A Full-Digital Technique to Mount a Maxillary Arch Scan on a Virtual Articulator. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(3):335-8. doi: 10.1011/jopr.13023.

• Mai HN, Lee DH. A Digital Technique to Replicate Edentulous Arches with Functional Borders and Accurate Maxillomandibular Relationship for Digital Complete Denture. J Prosthodont. 2020; Feb 17. doi: 10.1011/ jopr.13154.

• Lewis RC, Harris BT, Sarno R, Morton D, Llop DR, Lin WS. Maxillary and mandibular immediately loaded implant-supported interim complete fixed dental prostheses on immediately placed dental implants with a digital approach: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114:315-22. doi: 10.1006/j.prosdent.2015.03.021.

• Costa AJM, Teixeira Neto AD, Burgoa S, Gutierrez V, Cortes ARG. Fully Digital Workflow with Magnetic Connected Guides for full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation Following Guided Alveolar Ridge Reduction. J Prosthodont. 2020;29:272-6. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13150.

 

 

Tema 13. Cirugía guiada

• D’haese J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D, De Bruyn H, Tahmaseb A. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73:121-33. doi: 10.1111/prd.12175.

• Schubert O, Schweizer J, Stimmelmayr M, Nold E, Güte JF. Digital implant planning and guided implant surgery-workflow and reliability. Br Dent J. 2019;226:101-0. doi: 10.1038/sj.dbj.2019.44.

• Tatakis DN, Chien HH, Parashis AO. Guided implant surgery risks and their prevention. Periodontol 2000. 2019;81:194-208. doi: 10.1111/ prd.12292.

• Bover-Ramos F, Viña-Almunia J, Cervera-Ballester J, Peñarrocha-Diago M, García-Mira B. Accuracy of Implant Placement with Computer-Guided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Cadaver, Clinical, and In Vitro Studies. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 2018;33:101-115. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5556.

• El Kholy K, Lazarin R, Janner SFM, Faerber K, Buser R, Buser D. Influence of surgical guide support and implant site location on accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30:1067-75. doi: 10.1111/clr.13520.

• Al Yafi F, Camenisch B, Al-Sabbagh M. Is Digital Guided Implant Surgery Accurate and Reliable?. Dent Clin North Am. 2019;63:381-97. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2019.02.006.

• Colombo M, Mangano C, Mijirtsky E, Krebs M, Hauschild U, Fortin T. Clinical applications and effectiveness of guided implant surgery: a critical review based on randomized controlled trials. MBC Oral Health. 2017;17:150. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0441-y.

Tema 14. Impresión 3D. Parte I

• Kessler A, Hickel R, Reymus M. 3D Printing in Dentistry-State of Art. Oper Dent. 2020;45:30-40. doi: 10.2341/18-229-L.

• Abduo J. Accuracy of casts produced from conventional and digital workflows: A qualitative and quantitative analyses. J Adv Prosthodont. 2019;11:138-46. doi: 10.4047/jap.2019.11.2.138.

• Camardella LT, Vilella OV, van Hezel MM, Breuning KH. Accuracy of stereolithographically printed digital models compared to plaster models. J Orofac Orthop. 2017;78:394-402. doi: 10.1007/s00056-017-0093-1.

• Revilla-León M, Meyers MJ, Zandinejad A, Özcan M. A review on chemical composition, mechanical properties, and manufacturing workflow of additively manufactured current polymers for interim dental restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31:51-7. doi: 10.1111/ jerd.12438.

• Kim GB, Lee S, Kim H, Yang DH, Kim YH, Kyung YS, Kim CS, Choi SH, Kim BJ, Ha H, Kwon SU, Kim N. Three-Dimensional Printing: Basic Principles and Applications in Medicine and Radiology. Korean J Radiol. 2016;17:182-97. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.2.182.

• Tahayeri A, Morgan M, Fugolin AP, Bompolaki D, Athirasala A, Pfeifer CS, Ferracane JL, Bertassoni LE. 3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials. Dent Mater. 2018;34:192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.10.003.

• Alshawaf B, Weber HP, Finkelman M, El Rafie K, Kudara Y, Papaspyridakos P. Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions: A comparative in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29:835-42. doi: 10.1111/clr.13297.

Tema 15. Impresión 3D. Parte II

• Rungrojwittayakul O, Kan JY, Shiozaki K, Swamidass RS, Goodacre BJ, Goodacre CJ, Lozada JL. Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base. J Prosthodont. 2020;29:124-8. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13107.

• Loflin WA, English JD, Borders C, Harris LM, Moon A, Holland JN, Kasper FK. Effect of print layer height on the assessment of 3D-printed models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;156:283-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.02.013.

• Osman RB, Alharbi N, Wismeijer D. Build Angle: Does It Influence the Accuracy of 3D-Printed Dental Restorations Using Digital Light- Processing Technology?. Int J Prosthodont. 2017;30:182-8. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5117.

• Revilla-León M, Gonzalez-Martín Ó, Pérez López J, Sánchez-Rubio JL, Özcan M. Position Accuracy of Implant Analogs on 3D Printed Polymer versus Conventional Dental Stone Cast Measured Using a Coordinate Measuring Machine. J Prosthodont. 2018;27:560-7. doi: 10.1111/ jopr.12708.

• Alharbi N, Osman RB, Wismeijer D. Factors Influencing the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Full-Coverage Dental Restorations Using Stereolithography Technology. Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29:503-10. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4835.

Tema 16. Prótesis fija convencional: materiales y propiedades

• Sulaiman TA. Materials in digital dentistry-A review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32:171-81. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12566.

• Spitznagel FA, Boldt J, Gierthmuehlen PC. CAD/CAM Ceramic Restorative Materials for Natural Teeth. J Dent Res. 2018;97:1082-91. doi: 10.1177/0022034518779759.

• Lawson NC, Bansal R, Burgess JO. Wear, strength, modulus and hardness of CAD/CAM restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2016;32:e275-83. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.08.222.

• Güth JF, Magne P. Optical integration of CAD/CAM materials. Int J Esthet Dent. 2016;11:394-409.

• Meirelles L. Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials: An Overview of Clinical Uses and Considerations. American Dental Association. April 2017.

• Sociedad Española de Prótesis Estomatológica y Estética (SEPES). Tratamiento del sector posterior con restauraciones indirectas adhesivas CAD/CAM. Guía de uso. 2015.

• Gracias Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Silva NR, Bonfante EA. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2015;28:227-35. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4244.

• Chavali R, Neta AH, Lawson NC. Machinability of CAD-CAM materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118:194-99. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.022.

• Awada A, Nathanson D. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/ CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114:587-93. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.016.

• Blatz MB, Conejo J. The Current State of Chairside Digital Dentistry and Materials. Dent Clin North Am. 2019;63:175-97. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2018.11.002.

Tema 17. Prótesis fija convencional: implicaciones clínicas

• Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater. 2015;31:603-23. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.011.

• Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Makarov NA, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs. Dent Mater. 2015;31:624-39. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.013.

• Furtado de Mendonca A, Shahmoradi M, Gouvêa CVD, De Souza GM, Ellakwa A. Microstructural and Mechanical Characterization of CAD/ CAM Materials for Monolithic Dental Restorations. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:e587-94. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12964.

• Sailer I, Benic GI, Fehmer V, Hämmerle CHF, Mühlemann S. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118:43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.031.

• Mühlemann S, Benic GI, Fehmer V, Hämmerle CHF, Sailer I. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic posterior fixed partial dentures. Part II: Time efficiency of CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121:252-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.020.

• Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part I: Single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18 Suppl: 73-85.

• Sailer I, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II: Fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18 Suppl: 86-96.

Disilicato de litio

• Benic GI, Mühlemann S, Fehmer V, Hämmerle CH, Sailer I. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part I: digital versus conventional unilateral impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116:777-82. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.05.007.

• Sailer I, Benic GI, Fehmer V, Hämmerle CHF, Mühlemann S. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118:43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.031.

• Zeltner M, Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Özcan M, Hämmerle CHF, Benic GI. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117:354-62. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.04.028.

Zirconia

• Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Fehmer V, Hämmerle CHF, Benic GI. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part I: Time efficiency of complete-arch digital scans versus conventional impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121:69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.021.

• Mühlemann S, Benic GI, Fehmer V, Hämmerle CHF, Sailer I. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic posterior fixed partial dentures. Part II: Time efficiency of CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121:252-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.020.

• Benic GI, Sailer I, Zeltner M, Gütermann JN, Özcan M, Mühlemann S. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part III: Marginal and internal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121:426-31. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.05.014.

Tema 18. Prótesis fija sobre implantes: impresiones

• Benic GI, Mühlemann S, Fehmer V, Hämmerle CH, Sailer I. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part I: digital versus conventional unilateral impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116:777-82. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.05.007.

• Sailer I, Benic GI, Fehmer V, Hämmerle CHF, Mühlemann S. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118:43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.031.

• Zeltner M, Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Özcan M, Hämmerle CHF, Benic GI. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117:354-62. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.04.028. ZIRCONIA

• Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Fehmer V, Hämmerle CHF, Benic GI. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part I: Time efficiency of complete-arch digital scans versus conventional impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121:69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.021.

• Mühlemann S, Benic GI, Fehmer V, Hämmerle CHF, Sailer I. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic posterior fixed partial dentures. Part II: Time efficiency of CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121:252-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.020.

• Benic GI, Sailer I, Zeltner M, Gütermann JN, Özcan M, Mühlemann S. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part III: Marginal and internal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121:426-31. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.05.014.

Tema 19. Prótesis fija sobre implantes: impresiones de arcada completa

• Mizumoto RM, Yilmaz B. Intraoral scan bodies in implant dentistry: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120:343-52. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.029.

• Mangano FG, Hauschild U, Veronesi G, Imburgia M, Mangano C, Admakin O. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: a comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19:101. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0792-7.

• Rutkünas V, Gečiauskaitė A, Jegelevičius D, Vaitekūnas M. Accuracy of digital implant impressions with intramural scanners. A systematic review. Our J Oral Implantol. 2017;10:101-20.

• Flügge TV, Att W, Metzger MC, Nelson K. Precision of Dental Implant Digitalization Using Intraoral Scanners. Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29:277-83. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4417.

• Gintaute A, Papatriantafyllou N, Aljehani M, Att W. Accuracy of computerized and conventional impression-making procedures for multiple straight and tilted dental implants. Int J Esthet Dent. 2018;13:550-65.

• Alikhasi M, Alsharbaty NHM, Moharrami M. Digital Implant Impression Technique: A Systematic Review. Implant Dent. 2017;26:929-35. doi: 10.1097/ID0000000000000683.

Tema 20. Prótesis fija convencional: ajuste interno y marginal

• Chochlidakis K, Papaspyridakos P, Tsigarida A, Romeo D, Chen YW, Natto Z, Ercoli C. Digital Versus Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Prospective Study on 16 Edentulous Maxillae. J Prosthodont. 2020; 12. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13162.

• Amin S, Weber HP, Finkelman M, El Rafie K, Kudara Y, Papaspyridakos P. Digital vs. Conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28:1360-7. doi: 10.1111/clr.12994.

• Iturrate M, Eguiraun H, Solaberrieta E. Accuracy of digital impressions for implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis, using an auxiliary geometry part-An in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30:1250-8. doi: 10.1111/clr.13549.

• Iturrate M, Minguez R, Pradies G, Solaberrieta E. Obtaining reliable intraoral digital scans for an implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis: A dental technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121:237-41. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.008.

Tema 21. Prótesis fija sobre implantes: materiales en restauraciones unitarias

• Papadiochou S, Pissiotis AL. Marginal adaptation and CAD-CAM technology: A Systematic review of restorative material and fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119:545-51. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.001.

• Souza RO, Özcan M, Pavanelli CA, Buso L, Lombardo GH, Michida SM, Mesquita AM, Bottino MA. Marginal and internal discrepancies related to margin design of ceramic crowns fabricated by a CAD/CAM system. J Prosthodont. 2012;21:94-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00793.x.

• Zeltner M, Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Özcan M, Hämmerle CHF, Benic GI. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117:354-62. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.04.028.

• Benic GI, Sailer I, Zeltner M, Gütermann JN, Özcan M, Mühlemann S. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part III: Marginal and internal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121:426-31. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.05.014.

• Freire Y, Gonzalo E, Lopez-Suarez C, Suarez MJ. The Marginal Fit of CAD/CAM Monolithic Ceramic and Metal-Ceramic Crowns. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:299-304. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12590.

• Lo Russo L, Caradonna G, Biancardino M, De Lillo A, Troiano G, Guida L. Digital versus conventional workflow for the fabrication of multiunit fixed prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of vertical marginal fit in controlled in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;122:435-40. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.001.

• Su TS, Sun J. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116:362-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.018.

Tema 22. Prótesis fija sobre implantes: materiales en restauraciones múltiples

• Edelhoff D, Schweiger J, Prandtner O, Stimmelmayr M, Güth JF. Metal- free implant-supported single-tooth restorations. Part I: Abutments and cemented crowns. Quintessence Int. 2019;50:176-84. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a41906.

• Edelhoff D, Schweiger J, Prandtner O, Stimmelmayr M, Güth JF. Metal- free implant-supported single-tooth restorations. Part II: Hybrid abutment crowns and material selection. Quintessence Int. 2019;50:260-9. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a42099.

• Nouhl I, Kern M, Sabet AE, Aboelfadl AK, Hamdy AM, Chaar MS. Mechanical behavior of posterior all-ceramic hybrid-abutment-crowns versus hybrid-abutments with separate crowns-A laboratory study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30:90-8. doi: 10.1111/clr.13395.

• Abou-Ayash S, Strasding M, Rücker G, Att W. Impact of prosthetic material on mid- and long-term outcome of dental implants supporting single crowns and fixed partial dentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10:47–65.

• Spitznagel FA, Horvath SD, Gierthmuehlen PC. Prosthetic protocols in implant-based oral rehabilitations: A systematic review on the clinical outcome of monolithic all-ceramic single- and multi-unit prostheses. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10:89–99.

• Priest G. A Current Perspective on Screw-Retained Single-Implant Restorations: A Review of Pertinent Literature. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29:161–71. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12283.

• Alfawaz Y. Zirconia Crown as Single Unit Tooth Restoration: A Literature Review. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016;17:418–22.

• Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH, Schneider D. Cemented and screw-retained implant reconstructions: a systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2012;23:163–201.

 

 

Tema 23. Dispositivos oclusales digitales

• Blasi A, Torosian AD, Aimplee S, Bin Im S, Camba AM, Chiche GJ. Implant-Supported Zirconia Full-Mouth Rehabilitations: Key Factors. QDT 2017;1:155-75.

• Abdulmajeed AA, Lim KG, Närhi TO, Cooper LF. Complete-arch implant- supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115:672-77. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.025.

• Caramês J, Tovar Suing L, Yu YC, Pérez A, Kang M. Clinical Advantages and Limitations of Monolithic Zirconia Restorations Full Arch Implant Supported Reconstruction: Case Series. Int J Dent. 2015;2015:392496. doi: 10.1155/2015/392496.

• Caramês J, Marques D, Malta Barbosa J, Moreira A, Crispim P, Chen A. Full-arch implant-supported rehabilitations: A prospective study comparing porcelain-veneered zirconia frameworks to monolithic zirconia. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30:68-78. doi: 10.1111/clr.13393.

• Venezia P, Torsello F, Cavalcanti R, D’Amato S. Retrospective analysis of 26 complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia prostheses with feldespathic porcelain veneering limited to the facial surface. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114:506-12. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.02.010.

• Tischler M, Patch C, Bidra AS. Rehabilitation of edentulous jaws with zirconia complete-arch fixed implant-supported prostheses: An up to 4-year retrospective clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120:204-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.12.010.

• Limmer B, Sanders AE, Reside G, Cooper LF. Complications and patient- centered outcomes with an implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prosthesis: 1 year results. J Prosthodont. 2014;23:267-75. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12110.

• Chong KK, Palamara J, Wong RH, Judge RB. Fracture force of cantilevered zirconia frameworks: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112:849-56.

• Oh W, Götzen N, Anusavice KJ. Influence of connector design on fracture probability of ceramic fixed-partial dentures. J Dent Res. 2002;81:623-7.

• Oh W, Anusavice KJ. Effect of connector design on the fracture resistance of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:536-42.

Tema 24. Innovaciones digitales. Parte I

• Salmi M, Paloheimo KS, Tuomi J, Ingman T, Mäkitie. A digital process for additive manufacturing of occlusal splints: a clinical pilot study. J R Soc Interface. 2013;10:20130203. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0203.

• Lauren M, McIntyre F. A new computer-assisted method for design and fabrication of occlusal splints. Am J Orthod Dentofcial Orthop. 2008;133:S103-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.018.

• Brandt S, Brandt J, Lauer HC, Kunzmann A. Clinical evaluation of laboratory-made and CAD-CAM-fabricated occlusal devices to treat oral parafunction. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;122:123-28.

• Dedem P, Türp JC. Digital Michigan splint - from intraoral scanning to plasterless manufacturing. Int J Comput Dent. 2016;19:63-76.

• Edelhoff D, Schweiger J, Prandtner O, Trimpl J, Stimmelmayr M, Güth JF. CAD/CAM splints for the functional and esthetic evaluation of newly defined occlusal dimensions. Quintessence Int. 2017;48:181-91. technology. J Prosthet Dent. 2019. 121: 749-53. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.07.010.

Tema 25. Innovaciones digitales. Parte II

• Schlichting LH, Schlichting KK, Stanley K, Magne M, Magne P. An approach to biomimetics: the natural CAD/CAM restoration: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111:107-15. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.08.006.

• Lee H, Fehmer V, Kwon KR, Burkhardt F, Pae A, Sailer I. Virtual diagnostics and guided tooth preparation for the minimally invasive rehabilitation of a patient with extensive tooth wear: A validation of a digital workflow. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123:20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.023.

• Chen X, Zhou N, Ding M, Jing J, Xi Q, Wu G. A digital guiding device to facilitate cementation of porcelain laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent. 2019. pii: S0022-3919(19)30690-0. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.10.011.

• Lee JH. Digital approach to fabricating an implant indexing device for dental implant abutments. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123:393-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.007.

• Alshhrani WM, Al Amri MD. Customized CAD-CAM healing abutment for delayed loaded implants. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116:176-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.024.

• Lee JH. Fabricating a crown under an existing removable partial denture with impression scanning and CAD-CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent. 2019. pii: S0022-3913(19)30428-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.016.

• Lee JH. A completely digital approach to scanning dental implants placed in a limited space or with an adverse angulation. J Prosthet D e n t. 2 0 2 0. p i i : S 0 0 2 2 - 3 9 1 3 ( 1 9 ) 3 0 6 9 6 - 1. d o i : 1 0. 1 0 1 6 / j.prosdent.2019.10.016.

• Magne P, Schlichting LH. Biomimetic CAD/CAM restoration made of human enamel and dentin: case report at 4th year of clinical service. Int J Esthet Dent. 2016;11:472-80.

• Schlichting LH, Magne P. Double-milled CAD-CAM composite resin restorations: A proof-of-concept approach to producing histoanatomic bilaminar restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2019. pii: S0022-3913(19)30598-0. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.006.

• Lee H, Kwon KR. A CAD-CAM device for preparing guide planes for removable partial dentures: A dental technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2019. 122: 10-3. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.06.011.

• Lee JH. Fabricating a reduction guide for parallel guiding planes with computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing

  • Recursos: Bases de datos bibliográficas (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science), software de diseño CAD (Exocad, 3Shape, Meshmixer u homologados), escáneres intraorales y campus virtual.
Print version